<html>
<body>
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Post-human, Evolution and the
Avatar<br>
by Debashish on Sun 26 Nov 2006 12:16 AM PST | Profile |
<a href="http://www.sciy.org/blog/_archives/2006/11/21/2517697.html#787073">
Permanent Link</a><br>
Yes, this necessiy for a language of deconstruction/reconstruction for
translation into a "global commons" I agree with and feel
strongly the need for mysef. I see this need in terms of an engagement of
the specialized formation of every theoretical discourse - philosophical,
psychological, social, cultural, scientific - with the Aurobindonian
logos. But this is also a matter of engagement and renewal of whatever
world-languages we use at present, themselves evolving and in need often
of stretching/rupturing/transfoming through that engagement. Contemporary
Science may certainly give us "a" helpful language here (so
long as it is not an <b>Esperanto</b>, for which, coming from India, I
anticipate race-riots). But to my sensibility, hybrid practices of
language (which we are already engaged in here and in this, too, Sri
Aurobindo is himself the predecessor) side by side with a growing archive
of flexible translations would be nice. <br><br>
DB<br><br>
<br>
----------------------------<br><br>
Esperanto once again the whipping boy of religious and mystical cranks.
This one's from India.</body>
</html>